Characterization of the physical chemical composition of pulps of three ecotypes of soursop (Annona muricata L.) and obtaining nectar with whey

Keywords: nona muricata; soursop; whey; calcium; phosphorus; néctar.

Abstract

The aim of this research was to compare the physicochemical composition of pulps of three ecotypes of soursop (Annona muricata L) to obtain nectar with whey, their physical characteristics, bromatological and physicochemicals (ash, protein, fat, moisture, fiber, phenolic compounds and calcium). The results showed significant statistical differences between the pulps regarding their physical, bromatological and physicochemical properties; except for fat analysis. The soursop pulp of the black ecotype had a higher calcium content 507,283 mg / kg (P <0,05) than white and yellow soursop and phosphorous 520,500 mg / kg more than the yellow. Likewise, it has adequate technological properties such as little fiber; pH of 4,55, Brix of 18,2 and best yield 63,2% despite being the smallest with an average length of 9,6 ± 1,8 cm and diameter of 8,7 ± 1,0 cm. The nectars had high content of calcium and phosphorus 182,50 and 285,50 mg / kilo of nectar, although no significant differences were found between nectars of the three soursop ecotypes, but there were significant differences in the organoleptic results; where the nectars with the ecotype black and yellow had greater acceptability tan ecotype white, the first two being ideal for processing of nectars.

References

1. FERNÁNDEZ, M.; MARETTE, A. Potential health benefits of combining yogurt and fruits based on their probiotic and prebiotic properties.Adv. Adv. Nutr. Int. Rev. 2017, 8(1), pp.155S–164S. ISSN 2161-8313. 2. MORÓN, J.; MORÓN, D.; NODARSE, M. Valoración de la evidencia científica para recomendar Annona muricata L. (guanábana) como tratamiento o prevención del cáncer. Rev. Cubana Plant Med. 2010, 15(3), pp.169-181. ISSN 1028-4796. 3. CORIA, A.; MONTALVO, E.; YAHIA, E.; et al. Annona muricata: A comprehensive review on its traditional medicinal uses, phytochemicals, pharmacological activities, mechanisms of action and toxicity. Arabian Journal of Chemistry. 2018, 11 (5), pp.662691.ISSN:1878-5352. 4. BRANDAO, A.; SANTOS, D. Nutritional value of the pulp of different sugar apple cultivars (Annona squamosa L.). Nutritional composition fruit cultivars. 2016, . DOI:10.1016/B978-0-12-408117-8.00009-X 5. MIRANDA, F. Evaluación de métodos de injertación para la propagación de guanábana (Annona muricata, L.) Annonaceae. Universidad Rafael Landívar.Guatemala.2017. Informe inédito 6. LEÓN, G.; GRANADOS, C.; OSORIO, M.D. Caracterización de la pulpa de Annona Muricata L. cultivada en el Norte del Departamento de Bolívar-colombia. Rev cubana Plant Med. 2016, 21(4), pp.1-9. ISSN 1028-4796. 7. LEIVA, S., GAYOSO, G.; CHANG, L. Annona muricata L. “guanábana” (Annonaceae), una fruta utilizada como alimento en el Perú prehispánico. Arnaldoa. 2018, 25(1), pp. 127-140. ISSN 1815-8242. 8. MARTÍNEZ, E. El calcio, esencial para la salud. Nutr. Hosp.2016, 33(supl.4), pp.2631. ISSN 0212-1611. 9. GOMES, J.; SÁNCHEZ, O. Producción de galacto oligosacáridos: alternativa para el aprovechamiento del lactosuero. Ingeniería y Desarrollo. Universidad del Norte. 2019, 37(1), pp.129-158, ISSN: 0122-3461.
10. MAZORRA, M. A.; MORENO J.M. Propiedades y opciones para valorizar el lactosuero de la quesería artesanal. Ciencia UAT. 2019, 14(1), pp.133-144. ISSN 2007-7521. 11. RADY, I.; BLOCH, M.B.; CHAMCHEU, R.C.; et al. Anticancer properties of Graviola (Annona muricata): A comprehensive mechanistic. Oxidative Medicine and Cellular Longevity. 2018. ID 1826170, pp.1-40. ISSN: 1942-0900. 12. SALAZAR, A.; OBLITAS J.; ERIKA ROJAS, E. Reutilización del lactosuero ácido y dulce de las queserías de Cajamarca en la elaboración de una bebida con sabor a poroporo (Passiflora Mollisima) y sauco (Sambucus Peruviana). Agroind Sci. 2016, 6 (1), pp. 45-51. ISSN 2216-2989. 13. NANATO, C.; DUARTE, D.; GÓMEZ, N.; et al. Chemical characterization and evaluation of antioxidant and antimicrobial properties of the pulp oil of fruits of Mauritia flexuosa L. f. Blacpma. 2020, 19 (4), pp. 408-419. ISSN 07177917. 14.AOAC.Association of Official Analytical Chemistry.Official Method of Analysis. 2019. Virginia, USA. Publicación interna. 15. MINISTERIO DE SALUD. Tablas Peruanas de Composición de Alimentos.2017. Lima, Perú. ISBN: 978-612-310-117-6. 16. ARRUDA, H.; PEREIRA, G.A.; MORAIS, D.R.; et al. G.M. Determination of free, esterified, glycosylated and insoluble-bound phenolics composition in the edible part of araticum fruit (Annona crassiflora Mart.) and its by-products by HPLC-ESI-MS/MS. Food Chemistry.2018,245,pp.738-749. ISSN: 0308-8146 17. LOYOLA, N.; ROJAS, M.; ACUÑA, C.; et al. Elaboración y valoración sensorial y fisicoquímica de néctar de mezcla de remolacha, zanahoria y jugo de naranja. Idesia. 2019, 37(4). ISSN 0073-4675. 18. MEILGAARD, M.C.; CIVILLE, G.V.; Y CARR, B.T. Sensory evaluation techniques. 2015. ed. Boca Raton, Fl, Estados Unidos de América. 600 p. ISBN 9781482216905. 19. NTP 203.110:2009 (s.f). Norma Técnica Peruana de Jugos, Néctares y Bebidas de Fruta. 2009. 20. VILLARREAL-FUENTES, J.; ALIA-TEJACAL, I.; HERNÁNDEZ-SALVADOR, M.; et al. Caracterización in situ de guanábana (Annona muricata L.) en la región del Soconusco, Chiapas, México. Revista Chapingo. Serie horticultura. 2020, 26 (3), pp.189-205. ISSN 1027-152X.
21. JIMÉNEZ, J.; BALOIS, R.; ALIA, I.; et al. Caracterización de frutos de guanabana (Annona muricata L.) en Tepic, Nayarit, México. Rev. Mex. Cienc. Agríc. 2016, 7(6), pp. 1261-1270. ISSN: 2007-0934. 22. BASKARAN, R.; RAVI, R.; Y RAJARATHNAM, S. Thermal Processing Alters the Chemical Quality and Sensory Characteristics of Sweetsop (Annona squamosa L.) and Soursop (Annona muricata L.) Pulp and Nectar. Journal of Food Science.2016, 81(1) ,pp. S182-S188.ISSN:1750-3841. 23. TIENCHEU, B.; EGBE, A.; ACHIDI, A.; et al. 2021. Propiedades nutricionales, organolépticas y fitoquímicas de la guanábana (Annona muricata) Pulpa y Jugo después de la maduración postcosecha. Revista europea de nutrición y seguridad alimentaria.2021, 13, pp.15-28. ISSN: 2347-5641. 24. BABAJI, S. Y ABU, M.F.Soursop Annona muricata. India. Elserver.2018.ISBN:9780-12-803138-4. 25. DEGNON, R.; ADJOU, E.; NOUDOGBESSI, J.; et al. Investigation on nutritional potential of soursop (Annona muricata L.) from Benin for its use as food supplement against protein-energy deficiency. Int. J. Biosci.2013, 3 (6), pp. 1-10. ISSN: 22206655. 26. PETERS. M.; BADRE, N.; Y COMISSIONG, E. Processing and quality evaluation of soursop (Annona Murcata L) Nectar. Journal of Food Quality.2001, 24 (5): 361374.ISSN: 0146-9428. 27. ARRAZOLA, G.; BARRERA, J. Y VILLALBA, M. Determinación física y bromatológica de la guanábana cimarrona. Orinoquia – Colombia.2013, 17(2), pp.159166. ISSN: 0121-3709. 28. ABDUALRAHMAN, M.; MA, H.; ZHOU,C.; et al. Original article Postharvest physicochemical properties of the pulp and seed oil from Annona squamosa L. (Gishta) fruit grown in Darfur region, Sudan. Arabian Journal of Chemistry. 2019.12, pp.4514–4521.ISSN: 1878-5352. 29. SANTOS, M.; SILVA, M.; ALVESDA, JL.; et al. Effect of spray drying on bioactive and volatile compounds in soursop (Annona muricata) fruit Pulp. Research food international. 2019,124, pp.70-77. ISSN: 0963-9969. 30. CORREA GORDILLO, J.; ORTIZ, D.; LARRAHONDO, J.; et al. Actividad antioxidante en guanábana (Annona muricata L.). Boletín Latinoamericano y del Caribe de Plantas Medicinales y Aromáticas. 2012, 11 (2), pp.111-126. ISSN: 07177917.
31. GUIMARÃES J.; SILVA, E.; ARRUDA H.; et al. How does the degree of inulin polymerization affect the bioaccessibility of bioactive compounds from soursop whey beverage during in vitro gastrointestinal digestion? Food Hydrocolloids.2020,101(105511), pp.1-33. ISSN: 0268-005X. 32. GUTIÉRREZ, E.; AMBRIZ,D.; LEYVA, N.; et al. Dietary phenolic compounds, health benefits and bioaccessibility. Arch. Lat. Amer. Nut.2016, 66(2), pp.87-100.ISSN 0004-0622. 33. PEÑARRIETA, M.; TEJEDA, L.; MOLLINEDO, P.; VILA, J.; BRAVO, J. Compuestos fenólicos y su presencia en alimentos. Revista Boliviana de Química.2014, 31(2), pp. 68-81. ISSN: 0250-5460. 34. ZOUARI, A.; BRIARD-BION, V.; GAUCHERON, F.; et al. 2020. Effect of pH on the physicochemical characteristics and the surface chemical composition of camel and bovine whey protein’s powders. Food Chemistry. 2020, 333, pp.127514. ISSN: 03088146. 35. YADAV, J. S. S.; YAN, S.; PILLI, S.; et al. 2015. Cheese whey: A potential resource to transform into bioprotein, functional /nutritional proteins and bioactive peptides. Biotechnology Advances.2015, 33(6), pp.756-774. ISSN: 0734-9750. 36. CÁMARA, M.; DÍEZ, C. Y TORIJA, E. Caracterización química de jugos y néctares de piña. Análisis de componentes principales. Food Chemistry.1995, 54 (1), pp.93100. ISSN: 0308-8146. 37. OBREGÓN-LA ROSA, A.; ELÍAS-PEÑAFIEL, C.; CÓRDOVA-RAMOS, J. Desarrollo de un néctar funcional a partir de aguaymato (Physalis peruviana), camu camu (Myrciaria dubia) y pitahaya (Selenicereus megalanthus) enriquecido con la adición de fibra soluble. Tecnología Química. 2019,39(3), pp. 690-703.ISSN 22246185. 38. ANAYA-ESPARZA, L.; MÉNDEZ-ROBLES, M.; SAYAGO-AYERDI, S.; et al. Effect of thermosonication on pathogenic bacteria, quality attributes and stability of soursop nectar during cold storage. CYTA – Journal of Food. 2017, 15, pp. 592–600. ISSN: 1947-6337. 39. ASWATHY, K. Y NIRMALA, C. 2016. Development of fruit nectar from annonaceous fruits. Indian Journal of Plant Sciences.2016, 5(3), pp.46-52. ISSN: 2319-3824.
Published
2022-08-31
How to Cite
Paitan-Anticona, E., Marmolejo-Gutarra, D., Marmolejo-Gutarra, K., Sotelo-Méndez, A., & Cueva-Ríos, M. (2022). Characterization of the physical chemical composition of pulps of three ecotypes of soursop (Annona muricata L.) and obtaining nectar with whey. Chemical Technology, 42(3), 452-472. Retrieved from https://tecnologiaquimica.uo.edu.cu/index.php/tq/article/view/5273
Section
Artículos